HDR Cookbook – The General HDR Workflow
In this section, I will describe my general HDR workflow. I will not go into the details as these will be discussed in other sections. Once you have shot the photos out in the field, the HDR work really only starts. I know what you think: “He’s right! You still have to run the shots through an HDR program to get the final image.” But this is actually only a tiny fraction of the complete HDR workflow that (at least) I execute before an HDR photo is finished.
The first rule of thumb is:
Creating the HDR and doing the tone mapping takes minutes, the work required in Photoshop after that can take hours!
In the Internet, you can see tons of HDR photos that were not post-processed in any way. The usual result is a picture that looks flat with little contrast.
The Complete HDR Workflow
In summary, my personal HDR workflow goes like this:
- Create the source shots using the exposures that are adequate for the dynamic range of the subject. This may be the standard three shots (+2, 0, –2 EV). It may also be 5 or even 9 shots. By all means shot in RAW format. This provides the best quality and flexibility. I have shot in JPEG for a long time, and I wish I used RAW right from the start. Especially in post-processing, the difference is huge!
- Take your time – I discovered that directly after a shoot, I am not able to get the most out of a shot. It is better to let them linger on you disk for a few days. Then, when you look at them again, you are more objective in your judgment about what are the good shots and what are the bad ones.
- Select the best shot (bracketed series) and start creating the HDR image.
- Adobe Camera RAW (ACR)
- If your lens tends to create chromatic aberration (CA – color fringes on high-contrast edges), load the RAW shots into Adobe Camera RAW (ACR) and correct that. If you don’t, then these color fringes will be amplified in the HDR process, leading to very ugly-looking images. ACR does a very good job at removing those artifacts. Photomatix (at least until version 4.0), on the other hand, is very poor at doing this!
- You should also check if all source images have the same color temperature (white balance). If this is not the case, set the White Balance for each image to the same value. This is particularly important if you are working on an HDR panorama.
- Save the corrected photos as 16-bit TIFs.
- Early noise reduction: Experiments show that applying NR at this early stage, before feeding the source exposures into Photomatix, produces cleaner and sharper images. This would be the point in your HDR workflow that is ideal for early NR.
- Make sure you turn off any NR and sharpening in ACR.
- Load the TIFFs produced by ACR into Photoshop and apply your favorite NR software to each of the exposures. Make sure you read my tips on this method.
- Save the results back to TIFFs and use those in the next step as input to Photomatix.
- Photomatix
- Load the (possibly corrected photos) into Photomatix. If they are already CA-corrected, do not choose the respective option in Photomatix.
- Avoid any correction of ghosting if at all possible. Using this option normally reduces image quality. In Photomatix Pro 4.0 and above, there is a semi-automatic deghosting option that can be used to get rid of ghosts in specific areas without contaminating the entire picture with deghosting artifacts.
- Create and save the HDR
- Go to the tone mapping dialog and define your tone mapping options. Once you have found settings that suit your style, this usually takes only 10-15 of minutes. Change the settings in a small region around your preferred settings to see whether the image needs any particular adjustments. My most important advice about the tone mapping is: Be conservative! Extreme settings will result in ugly-looking pictures. Excessive halos and contrast inversions (e.g. the sky being darker than the building in the foreground) are usually the results.
- Click on “process” and save the result as 16-bit TIF.
- Photoshop
- Load the tone mapped image in Photoshop to start the post-processing.
- Make necessary transformations to correct the image (e.g. perspective correction and/or rotation to straighten the horizon). Do this before you do anything else!
- If you are using Topaz Adjust or a similar tool to enhance local contrast and colors, I recommend to apply this first: Make a copy of the background layer and apply the filter of your choice.
- Apply some noise reduction. The tone mapping process tends to increase the noise in the image such that noise reduction is a must for any HDR photo. You should apply it early in the whole process in order not to amplify the noise with your other processing steps. I recommend Topaz DeNoise. It is simple and very effective. Make a copy of the layer treated with Topaz Adjust and apply Topaz Denoise to it. NOTE: If you applied NR already before the HDR merging and tone-mapping, you may not need this step. Look out for noise that sneaked back into your image and remove it selectively.
- Standard global adjustments may be the most obvious things to improve the image and should be applied in any case. These include Levels (or Curves) adjustments to correct the contrast and brightness and saturation adjustments to enhance the colors. Use adjustment layers instead of the dialogs found under “Image > Adjustments” wherever possible. This allows for a very flexible editing where you can change, turn on, and turn off the adjustments at any time.
- However, in order to really get the most out of your photo, you need to apply specific adjustments selectively to individual parts of the image. For example, if an image contains sky, it it may be desirable to enhance the blue tones in this part of the image without affecting the other parts of the image. E.g. the warm tones of a Mediterranean house will suffer from increasing the blue tones globally. Such a selective adjustment requires sophisticated masking abilities. My experience is that masking is the single most important technique required for good post-processing results.
- Apply some sharpening to the final image. When you are done with the other post-processing steps, your image will be dispersed over multiple layers, each of which has a mask to reveal only some parts of the image. The most frequently used sharpening method – the unsharp mask – is not well suited to sharpen such an image because it modifies the bits of a specific layer directly. I recommend using the high-pass filter for sharpening. This filter isolates only the edges of the image.
- Apply a vignetting effect if it suits the image. Vignetting darkens the edges of the image and focuses the attention of the viewer on the middle of the image. Some subjects can really be improved using this technique. It can increase the depth perceived by the viewer considerably.
- Create a frame. Whether you do this depends on your own personal preferences and on how you wish to present the final image. When you present the image via the Internet, a frame can improve the visual impression considerably.
- Change the mode from 16 bits to 8 bits and save as a JPEG. Again, this depends on the way you want to present your work. For the Internet you usually need a JPEG.
- Let the finished file sit on your hard disk for a day or two. Don’t post it right away. I found that when you get back to it a day later, you will discover things that you might want to change, things that you did not discover while you were working on the details of the image very intensely. If you let you mind do other things and some time passes, you will look at the image more objectively, more like your viewers will. If you’re content with the image now, go ahead and post it.
- Set important EXIF data. EXIF is a standard for image meta data. Sometimes, this data gets stripped from the image during post-processing because some programs simply discard it. Use a tool like “exifool” to copy the EXIF data from the original 0 ev image to the final JPEG.
- Set the location data in the image. Tools like Geosetter allow you to write a location (longitude and latitude) where the image was taken into the meta data of the image. They take a GPS track that you may have recorded separately or you can manually define a location on a map and write it into the image.
- Upload to your favorite photo sharing platform and do not forget to describe the image properly.
- Done!
You can see that there is a lot of work involved with creating an excellent HDR image. You may think that this is boring and unnecessary. However, this is exactly what makes the difference between yet another photo and a real eye catcher. Of course, I assume that you got all the other photographic stuff right during the shooting (interesting perspective and composition, unique subject, perfect focus, uncluttered background, etc, etc, etc.). I am not going to write anything about this basic stuff since there are thousands of books on this subject.
Please Refer to This Page!
Did you find this tutorial helpful? Did you use it in your work? Then there is a simple way of giving something back to me:
Please refer to this page when presenting your work online. You can simply use the following HTML code in your image description to refer to this site in a way that you think is appropriate:
<a href=”http://farbspiel-photo.com/”>HDR Cookbook</a>
Why should you bother to refer to this page? Well, for you it is a convenient way of revealing information about your work. And you know, the more information you give, the more attention you get. You do not need to write a whole novel because I already did this for you here. For me, the reference is beneficial because it generates some attention for this cookbook.
So, you see that referring to this page is good for both of us – a real win-win situation. ![]()
Thanks!
32 Responses to HDR Cookbook – The General HDR Workflow
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
HDR Cookbook
- 21 HDR Photography Myths Busted (NEW!)
- Introduction
- Requirements
- Contents
- The Secrets of Hand-held HDR Shooting
- General HDR Workflow
- Why you need an artistic workflow
- Creating 32-bit HDRs the Right Way
- Correcting Chromatic Aberration
- Structuring a Project
- Complex Selections
- Using Topaz Adjust to Improve Your Images
- Reducing Halos
- Fixing Uneven Luminance
- Noise Reduction
- The Three Rules of Noise Reduction
- Sharpening
- Creating Clarity in Your Images
- Adding a Vignette Effect
- Adding a Frame
- Restoring Exif Data
- HDR Panoramas
- Taking Interior HDR Vertorama Shots
- Taking HDR Vertorama Shots with a Tripod
- 14 Tips for Quick and Effective Travel Photography
Featured Post
21 HDR Photography Myths Busted

A good way of getting things straight concerning a particular topic (in photography or elsewhere) is to bust some myths. Even though HDR photography has been around for a while, there are still a number of misconceptions out there that get picked up by beginners too easily. These HDR photography myths tend to lead into the wrong directions and ultimately get you frustrated. […]
Featured Post

Download the source exposures of this HDR image and test yor processing skills. The story of this photo This image was shot from a cruise ship in the harbor of Izmir, Turkey. On this day, the weather conditions were changing so quickly that we had blue sky in one minute and pouring rain the next. […]
Featured Post
HDR Pics to play with: Chain Bridge
This 'HDR Pics to play with' archive is containing the source exposures of the HDR image 'Chain Bridge – Budapest, Hungary (HDR)'. Download Below is the ZIP archive with the images. Make sure you read the information in Read This First. […]
Featured Post
HDR Before and After: New Mosque – Istanbul, Turkey (HDR Vertorama)
This is the HDR before and after comparison of "New Mosque - Istanbul, Turkey (HDR Vertorama)". The final image was created from 4x4 TIFF files (series of 4 autobracketed RAW images, +2, 0, -2EV that were converted to TIFFs using Abobe Camera RAW with the Five TIFFs method creating an additional +4EV image). You can see the 12 source images in the left three columns. […]
Featured Post

The story of this photo: I have been exploring macro photography lately. You probably know me for my HDR work, and don't worry, I will keep on creating HDRs. But I was always fascinated with macro photos. […]
Featured Post
HDR Cookbook – The Secrets of Hand-held HDR Shooting
Most HDR tutorials and books implicitly assume that you are using a tripod for your work. A tripod gives you stability, ensures that images are perfectly aligned straight out of the camera, and allows for long shutter speeds without blur. However, there are also a number of disadvantages, and in many situations you are forced to shoot hand-held. […]
Featured Post
HDR Cookbook – Creating HDR Images the Right Way
You start the process of creating a tone-mapped LDR image by merging all your source images into a single 32-bit HDR image. We all know that. Maybe you have done this already very often, and probably you think that there is not much to think about when you do this. […]
Featured Post
HDR Cookbook – Why you need an artistic workflow
Have you ever uploaded an image to your favorite photo sharing site just to come back the next day and discover that there are certain features in it that you don't like? Maybe the sky is too dark, the colors have too much saturation, or the contrast is too low. The reason for this is not necessarily your technical workflow - it may be your artistic workflow that needs improvement. […]
My Images




Reference: The Complete HDR Workflow, paragraph 4 – Adobe Camera Raw.
It seems that initial processing with ACR is only used for reducing or eliminating chromatic aberrations.
My question is: do you do anything else with the RAW shots other than correcting CA. I normally use the RAW exposed files “as is”.
Your comment made me think that most RAW files are very flat. When I use a RAW conversion program, I can dramatically change the quality of that / those RAW files.
Would it be better to use the original uncorrected (other than CA correction) or corrected RAW file processed files?
Hi,
I found that Photomatix (which is what I use) does a poor job at reducing CA. Thus, I prepare most images with ACR to reduce it before feeding them to Photomatix.
But you can do a lot more with ACR. You can reduce noise, change color temperatures, change saturation. etc. It depends on the image and your own workflow how you use it.
Cheers
Reference: The Complete HDR Workflow, paragraph 5-4 Tone Mapping.
Can you explain this comment “Change the settings in a small region around your preferred settings to see whether the image needs any particular adjustments”
I’m a little lost. What do yo mean when you state “preferred settings” and then please explain the small region statement.”
I think I know, but it would be better if you would explain a little more.
Thanks
Hi Pizellie,
a single HDR photographer tends to set the tone mapping parameters such that they are similar for most of his/her images. E.g. some like to set the strength really high while otheres consistently set the strength to a lower setting. So A single photographer has kind of a comfort zone of parameters. At least that’s my experience. I usually start in that “comfort zone” (a preset that I have saved) and from there I start applying little changes (small region around that zone) until I am pleased with the result. If I find that a particular image needs more redical changes, of course, I apply them. But I always start with my preset.
That’s at least how I do it. Other people may have different habits.
I hope that explains it a bit better.
Cheers
Excellent – That makes a lot of sense now. I now have to work on creating MCZ (My Comfort Zone).
Thanks
Enjoyed visiting your Flickr and WordPress sites. We have added your link as a favorite “HDR Chic” site. Well done!
Thanks for visiting my site and for adding my link to your site! I appreciate it! Keep on the great work!
Thank you for sharing your workflow. I will surely try this on my next images.
Best regards,
Loybuckz
Your welcome!
Have fun with your next images, and share your experiences!
farbspiel,
You commented above about useing ACR adjustments before combining in Photomatix; I do find that the recovery slider in RAW can mimimize small hotspot in the image quite effectively .
See Yah,
Scotty
Hi Jim,
yes, if your darkest exposure still has “hotspots”, you can try to work with the recovery slider and maybe with the exposure slider. I recommend creating a fourth image (if you have three original exposures) were you decrease the exposure by -1EV over the darkest of the three source images. Then you can feed all four into Photomatix.
Cheers
Farbspiel,
Now that we can save a corrected raw as a raw in
P.S. is there any advantage entering Photomatix with tiffs instead of 3 raws ??
Thank You,
Jim Scott
Hi Jim,
is this a feature in CS5? I have never tried this. Anyway, let me turn the question around: Is there any advantage in saving in raw format over TIFF? I cannot think of one. In any case, you should keep your unchanged original raw files and not overwrite them. So you need to create additional files anyway, and TIFF gives you everything you need.
So, unless there is some additional feature in adjusted raw files, I don’t see a reason for not saving as TIFF.
Cheers
Jim, I would like to know about how to save the raw in Photoshop. Could you walk me through that? Thanks! Kirk
Hi my friend, I am José from México, It has been a gift for me to find this site, I am a fan of HDR (not an expert) following your great instructions I know I will become an expert, I will try your instructions and really have to thank you for sharing your experience with these extraordinary explanations.
I have read about a video tutorial, where can I find it?
Once again thank you very much.
Your friend José.
Hi José,
thanks for the feedback, and I hope you will find a lot of new tricks here.
There is no video tutorial in the sense that I demonstrate and explain my work. But there are a number of Making-of videos that show a lot of the workflow. You will find that in the menu at the right side of your screen.
Cheers
___________________________
Visit me at facebook.com/farbspiel
and Google+ gplus.to/farbspiel
[...] I’m talking about? Stick around for this weekend and I’ll explain. Or head over to farbspiel’s page right now and prepare to learn!), ran all 5 TIF’s through Noiseware and Photomatix. [...]
I just found your site, and have been reading ever since.
Great stuff!
The way you have done the in depth experiments is just plan awesome!
Hats-off, Thumbs-Up and 5+ Stars!
- Andrew
Thanks a lot, Andrew!
___________________________
Visit me at Google+ gplus.to/farbspiel
and facebook.com/farbspiel
[...] HDR Cookbook – The General HDR Workflow [...]
[...] I mentioned the HDR work of Klaus Herrmann (farbspiel), and in particular, his post on “The General HDR Workflow“. “Let the finished file sit on your hard disk for a day or two. Don’t post it right [...]
I notice that in step 5, if i apply NR before feeding into photomatrix, that I lose some sharpness. Would you recommend NR + Sharpening before HDR, or NR only beforehand and sharpen only at step 7.7?
Hi Lars,
I would not sharpen before feeding the images into the HDR software. Sharpening amplifies the noise again. You should sharpen at the very end.
Cheers
Klaus
Hi my friend, I am from Hongkong.Do I need to turn off NR at Photomatix if I apply NR at early stage?
Thanks!
Sam
Hi Sam,
I turn NR in Photomatix off. With early NR, your images are already denoised. The NR in Photomatix would only make the image worse.
Cheers
Thanks alot !
[...] EN Besidomintiems Aukšto Dinaminio Diapazono (HDR) fotonuotrauka – specializuotas puslapis RU Brolių Liumjerų XXa. pradžios spalvotos [...]
I love your style of watermarking… is it wrong to attempt to use the same method?
Hi Mark,
if you like the watermark style and have fun using it, go ahead. But you should use another logo.
Cheers
Klaus
oh yes ofcourse… I have a different font for my own watermark. but I enjoy the method as it doesn’t distract from the image. Please if you ever see my work, consider it a tribute.
The cookbook has changed my business. Thanks so much.
Hi Debbie!
Thanks for this brief but interesting feedback. What is your business and how exactly did the HDR Cookbook change it, if I may ask.
Just curious.
Cheers
Klaus